Literacy Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia Action Research Movement

lighthouse roof image
Literacy for life text image
Literacy Nova Scotia logo with light house image

Nova Scotia Action Research Movement


 

NSCC School of Access Group

Research in Practice

Increasing Student Project Participation
in an Individually Paced Adult Learning Classroom

Defining the problem:

In an Individually Paced classroom the students do not always work at the same rate as their classmates. There are many demands on time so that all students are not always present at the same time. When working on an individual basis this fact does not cause a major difficulty for other students, only the individual is impacted. The problem of attendance and commitment surfaced when a group project was attempted and group meetings were necessary to maintain progress. Decisions could not be made and updates as to what had been accomplished were not always available. It was time to intervene.

The resulting question we will explore is: How can we increase student participation in a pre-planned class activity?

Reasons for negative behaviors:

Before attempting an intervention we had to determine some of the reasons for the lack of student commitment.

  • Lack of consequences to the students as a result of negative behavior. In order to overcome this we need to establish, and reinforce a set of consequences.
  • Peer influence on other students. If they are encouraging poor attendance it is a problem. If we can turn this around to use the peer pressure to punish non-participation the teacher can then be the facilitator not the enforcer.
  • Getting the learners to take ownership and accept responsibility for the project. If the instructor is making all the rules and setting the guidelines then it becomes his or her problem if the goals are not met. The key is to step back and allow the students to determine what must be accomplished in each session. If the session is not productive then the learners must determine for themselves what went wrong and what would be done about it. This may require skills the students have not yet developed and some intervention may be necessary to help them problem solve.
  • Lack of problem solving skills is a roadblock for many adult learners. They often allow others to make the decisions for them and have not had to explore solutions for themselves. By giving over more control of the project the students are forced to solve daily problems themselves rather than depend on others.
  • The ability of the instructor to relinquish control. Our nature as teachers is to lead and have others follow. By giving up control one runs the risk of chaos in the classroom. Allowing the students to make decisions and then respecting those decisions and accepting the consequences is a huge leap of faith for many.
  • Is project was relevant to the learners' personal lives? If the relevance is not there then adult learners will not buy into the project and other things will take prevalence.

Determining the desired result:

In discussing the behavior I was looking for the following themes surfaced.

  • The ever-present issue of attendance was in the forefront as well as was time spent on extra curricular activities, hall roaming and being present but not participating in the class. After much discussion we narrowed our focus down to getting the students to be present when meetings were called and taking on the responsibility of meeting deadlines. This paved the way to determining how to attain the desired result.

Obtaining the desired result:

After much discussion we determined that the key to increasing student participation is to allow them to take ownership of the project.

  • I would contact each student personally and express my difficulties with the results to date, and call one more meeting to which I would expect all of them to attend.
  • Turn over the control to the learners and ask them to determine how they were going to get the project completed, what roadblocks had to be overcome and what consequences there would be if the deadlines were not met.
  • Each student would be asked to reaffirm his or her commitment to the project and determine reasons why it was important.
  • A communication system would be set up so that each person would be able to access the up to date progress even if others were not present.
  • The students would be asked to set up a timeline of due dates that they agreed upon and felt they could meet.
  • A schedule of brief meetings would be established to determine next steps and troubleshoot arising problems.

The process:
  • The desired result is increasing the student participation in a preplanned class activity and the vehicle for our research on the topic is the cookbook a group of Level 4 adult learners is developing. I had been working on this project with the students for 2-3 months and the progress was painfully slow and frustrating. Every time I tried to get the group together to discuss progress several were missing. I had to find a way to encourage the students to take ownership of the project or abandon it altogether. The first thing I had to determine was if the project was important to the students or was it just important to me. If I did not have their commitment then I would not continue.
  • After meeting with the students I asked them to spend some time making up the timeline and distribute tasks to each person. This established accountability. If a student was not doing his/her share the others would let him/her know.
  • The template for the book was placed on the shared drive so each person could work on it as time allowed. A jump drive was also set up with the template so a student could take it home to work on after school hours.
  • A drawer of the filing cabinet in the classroom was allotted for the cookbook materials. Each student was able to access the space at any time.
  • Regular 5 – 10 minute meetings were set for the beginning of each class to discuss progress and next steps. After the meeting everyone went back to work either on the project or other work as they agreed upon in the meeting.
  • I set up a system of keeping notes on my observations during the process. I tracked attendance, time spent working on the project, who was taking the lead and other observations on the dynamics of the group.

The Results:

It is difficult to determine the degree of success I had with the new approach to this project. Several other factors intervened at this time to skew the results. Some of the students started jobs and were away due to work commitments part of the time. Some students were pushing to graduate in June and were concentrating their efforts in that area. A couple students were discontinued due to poor attendance and progress. Only a handful of students (3) continued to work diligently on the cookbook and put many hours into it. The original group consisted of 8 students.

The most important outcome of the intervention was that the cookbook was completed and received back from the printers the day before graduation. The students are proud of their work and have returned to see me on a regular basis to obtain books for friends. I believe the fact that I put the students in charge instilled in them more pride of accomplishment. They have a better idea of meeting deadlines and commitment to the group. They did not ask for marks for this project. The resulting book itself appeared to be rewarding in itself. Each student proudly displays the cookbook in his or her portfolio so I feel it has been a success.